Home Page
Saturday February 4th 2012

Is Worldwide Nuclear Disarmament Possible?

Is Worldwide Nuclear Disarmament Possible?

Page 1 2 3 4

 

 

 

 

Media has criticized President Obama for views they describe as ‘naïve and dangerous’ regarding global nuclear disarmament. They cite recent speeches, such as the one he gave in Prague on April 6, 2009, when he said “...the basic bargain is sound:  countries with nuclear weapons will move towards disarmament, (while) countries without nuclear weapons will not acquire them.” But what do foreign relations advisors and defense experts say? Is Worldwide Nuclear Disarmament Possible?

Background


Obama has indicated his plan for the US is to shrink nuclear arsenal, ban nuclear testing, and stop worldwide production of bomb materials because, in turn, he can see even reluctant allies more inclined to rewrite nuclear treaties and enforce sanctions against North Korea and Iran. He added that the plan cannot just be words -there must be punishment for anyone who defies this arrangement. But how could countries such as North Korea be punished, critics ask.

Obama is pushing Russia to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons.  Also, unlike Bush who did not want to be bound by international treaties, Obama wants to seal a quick deal between the US and Russia to cut the size of US nuclear weaponry substantially, with the hope that such a gesture will inspire other countries to join forces in the fight against terrorism.

In February 2009, Obama sent former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger to Russia, because the 1991 Start Treaty on strategic nuclear weapons with Russia is set to expire at the end of 2009. North Korea's decision to start testing missiles has imposed certain urgency to expediting a renewal of that Start Treaty. Russia is likely to agree because their economy has not allowed them to update their own deteriorating nuclear weaponry.   

Aside from 9/11 and Middle Eastern incidences of escalating terrorism otherwise forcing world leaders to focus more intently on finding ways to stop terrorists from the propagation of nuclear arms, those who have followed recent developments with North Korea certainly understand that strategies for somehow enforcing national security is of paramount importance and may require bolder actions of some nature.

...Continue reading>>



 

 

 

Suggest an article

Page 1 2 3 4

 

 

Share Email Print Feedback RSS Top of Page

 


 User Comments:

...
Nov 3, 2009 12:59 AM

@derick: umm korea? how about the USA and Israel? Who has the most nukes?

rake
Sep 28, 2009 8:59 PM

nukes are the end. peace and open arms for a new start

waberman
Sep 27, 2009 11:45 PM

national security is important but at waht cost

derick
Sep 27, 2009 8:25 PM

damn korea


Name:

Email: (This is optional and will not be displayed)

Message:


NOTE: Shave Magazine accepts no responsibility whatsoever for the content of comments made by users or any of the repercussions that may arise from such comments.

 

Disclaimer:All articles on Shave Magazine are expressly for entertainment and/or educational purposes only. The findings and opinionsof authors expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarilystate or reflect those of Shave Magazine. The information provided in anyspecialty section are only for generalreading. They should not be used for diagnosing or treating a healthproblems, disease or otherwise. No information in Shave Magazine should beused as a substitute for professional care. Shave Magazine assumes noresponsibility for how this material is used. Note that as someinformation changes, it may become out of date.

Don't trust the opinion of the salesperson or anyone else working on commission.

Do you have debt?


Severely
Of course, but no more than average
Just a little
None at all

You got questions, we got answers


 

"If you want a job done in the most efficient manner, hire a lazy man to do it!"

Heinlein